|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 17, 2020 21:03:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 18, 2020 21:24:07 GMT -5
In case you don't want to watch the interview. Here are some highlights. Artimus Pyle Says His Lynyrd Skynyrd Film Will Be ‘Cult Classic’ Martin Kielty February 18, 2020 Former Lynyrd Skynyrd drummer Artimus Pyle predicted that Street Survivors, the movie about his experiences surrounding the band’s devastating plane crash in 1977, would become a “cult classic” in time. The co-founding member said he was proud of the production that premiered at the Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival in Los Angeles on Feb. 16, despite the fact it was made without his former bandmates’ approval. Pyle announced his movie plans in 2016, which led to a lawsuit from guitarist Gary Rossington and the estates of Ronnie Van Zant and Steve and Cassie Gaines, who died in the crash. The legal action resulted in a permanent injunction being put in place, preventing Pyle from proceeding; however, that decision was overturned after an appeal in 2018. The final ruling was based on the fact that, even though an agreement prevented any member or former member working on a band-related project without the approval of at least two others, Pyle couldn’t be stopped from sharing his account of events from his own life. He’s heard as the film's narrator and played onscreen by actor Ian Shultis in the dramatization. “It was my story, and I didn't realize it was going to be my story,” Pyle told The Metal Voice at the premiere. “I thought it was going to be more general, but it was basically focused on what happened to me.” Describing the results as “intense,” he added, “I think the movie is going to be a cult classic. … There is also humor and sex, drugs and rock ’n’ roll. That's the way it was in the ‘60s and ‘70s.” He said he was “disappointed” that his former bandmates “didn't come with me to make a bigger movie, with a bigger budget." "They chose to try to destroy me rather than come to the table and make a film together," Pyle noted. "So this is what it turned out to be, and I’m very proud of it. I am proud of the director and ... the cast. " Pyle took part in Skynyrd’s reunion 10 years after the crash, and remained in the band until 1991, later citing legal and interpersonal problems for his departure. “The entire time we were doing the movie, we were being sued and we had thousand-dollar-an-hour bloodsucking attorneys coming at us the entire time," he said. "The director, Jared Cohn, and [production company] Cleopatra Entertainment's V.P. Tim Yasui and President Brian Perera kept the faith.” Street Survivors will appear in theaters soon. A home-video and soundtrack release are scheduled for June 30. ultimateclassicrock.com/artimus-pyle-lynyrd-skynyrd-movie/?fbclid=IwAR3GbSnSL3WYm3M99-ZMMFxmyX_xW3K6FHYfAU5HB_8Rcq6iUC_z5tD1X_w
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 20, 2020 10:53:54 GMT -5
I wonder if we can dig up any of those court filings? Where would they be?
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 20, 2020 19:37:32 GMT -5
I wonder if we can dig up any of those court filings? Where would they be? Are you talking about when Judy filed against Artimus and Cleopatra or the appeal? There is stuff posted on the forum when Judy filed and Cleopatra did not win the first round.
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 21, 2020 12:35:38 GMT -5
I watched this last night on the big screen and found it interesting to say the least... for one, the idiot behind the camera interviewed Artimus out of focus. Not very professional.
But Artimus told the story again of being shot by Johnny Mote and used the UnCivil War documentary video with Jake Tapper for his reference support which was interesting.
But one thing I really found interesting is today Artimus is still married (to my knowledge) still married to Kerri Hampton Pyle, and yet he was only talking about his wife Patricia while he was in original Lynyrd Skynyrd and saying how he wished today he was still married to her and had not been a dumbass cheating on her all through his Skynyrd career. Artimus expressed a lot of sorrow and regret for blowing that marriage. But to be married to another woman today and telling the world he wished he was still married to his first wife? Just wow! Says a lot about his present split in half marriage to the woman who told him he had to move out to protect his youngest son from crazies who could track Artimus' residence through certain public databases.
I also found the statements and claims by one of the executives of Cleopatra Films saying to all the world that it was his opinion that back in 1988 when Judy sued the band for product confusion that she and the judge flirted with each other and that this federal judge had the hots for Judy, so when Judy sued Cleopatra Films to stop Artimus from telling his story, he claimed that this federal judge still had the hots for Judy and he thought this was one reason as to why he would rule in her favor against Artimus and Cleopatra Films, and that when they filed the appeal it went into another court with 3 judges ruling over the court proceedings and this was why they were successful in the appeal process- because they got rid of the judge who had the hots for Judy!
This same man and Artimus then discussed how when Judy and Gary won in court to stop Cleopatra Films, that they err'd in legal authority and judgement because that court froze all of Cleopatra's bank accounts and financial assets and ILLEGALLY prevented this business entity from operating normal legal business all over the world NOT related to the film.
So the first reversal of the original ruling came in the form of a release giving him and his business their financial assets back to carry on normal business and livelihood. This never should have been shut down nor frozen. Judy and Gary should never have had that kind of legal power period. It was illegal and unconstitutional deprivation of guaranteed rights not to mention a violation of Artimus 1st amendment rights to freedom of speech.
In other words, Gary and Judy are the ones who overstepped the law by their unreasonable demands given to them by a federal judge who had the hots for Judy! Unreal!
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 21, 2020 12:39:50 GMT -5
Notice the name of the corporation used to sue Cleopatra and Artimus! Ronnie Van Zant, INC! I am sure he'd love that! NOT! -------------------------------------------------------- www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2018/10/ronnie-van-zant-inc-v-cleopatra-records-incRonnie Van Zant, Inc. v. Cleopatra Records, Inc. USCA, Second Circuit October 10, 2018 Second Circuit vacates permanent injunction blocking release of film that chronicles events before, during and after 1977 plane crash that killed members of band Lynyrd Skynyrd from perspective of surviving member, holding that injunction was based on “inconsistent, or at least insufficiently precise” language in prior consent order governing use of band’s name and story. Plaintiffs, surviving members of the band Lynyrd Skynyrd and heirs and representatives of the estates of deceased band members, filed a suit against Cleopatra Records Inc.; Cleopatra Films, a division of Cleopatra Records Inc.; and band member Artimus Pyle to enjoin them from releasing the film “Street Survivors: The True Story of the Lynyrd Skynyrd Plane Crash,” based on a consent order from a 1988 lawsuit, Grondin v. Rossington, between some of the parties to this present case. Ronnie Van Zant, Gary R. Rossington, Allen Collins and others founded the Southern rock band Lynyrd Skynyrd in the 1960s. Pyle joined the band as a drummer, and Steve Gaines joined as guitarist, vocalist and songwriter, in 1975. On Oct. 20, 1977, an airplane carrying the band members crashed in Mississippi. Van Zant, Gaines and several others died. Pyle, Rossington and Collins survived. After the plane crash, Judith Van Zant (Ronnie Van Zant’s widow), Rossington and Collins entered into a “blood oath,” promising never to use the name Lynyrd Skynyrd again. A decade later, however, the surviving band members launched a Lynyrd Skynyrd tribute tour. Judith sued Pyle, Rossington and others in the Grondin case, which ended with a consent order restricting how the parties can use the name Lynyrd Skynyrd, Ronnie Van Zant’s biographical material and the history of the band. The consent order permits the parties to exploit their own life stories and to portray their own experiences with the band in movies. Nearly 30 years later, Cleopatra decided to make a film about Lynyrd Skynyrd and the 1977 plane crash through the lens of one of the band members. Pyle signed a contract with Cleopatra giving him 5 percent of the film’s net receipts and credit as a consultant or co-producer, among other things. After learning about the film from press releases, plaintiffs sent a cease and desist letter to Cleopatra, asserting that, in accordance with the consent order, Cleopatra was “not authorized to make a film which either purports to be or is about the and, in whole or in part [and] not authorized to use the name, likeness, portrait, picture or biographical material of Rossington, [Van Zant] or [Gaines] in any manner.” Cleopatra went forward with the film.
Plaintiffs sued Cleopatra and Pyle in April 2017, seeking to enjoin them from releasing the film. After a two-day bench trial in July, the district court granted plaintiffs a permanent injunction prohibiting Cleopatra from distributing the film “and other related activities,” based on the consent order. Cleopatra argued that they could not be bound by the consent order, but the district court disagreed. Pyle’s activities ― advising on the script, cast and costumes, and writing original music for the film ― fell within the scope of the consent order, and because Cleopatra acted “in concert” with Pyle to produce the film, Cleopatra was similarly bound. In addition to the injunction against Cleopatra, the court awarded judgment to plaintiffs and against Cleopatra and Pyle, jointly and severally, for attorneys’ fees and costs.
Defendants appealed, arguing that the district court’s ruling was a “classic First Amendment violation involving an unlawful prior restraint.” The Second Circuit rejected this argument on the grounds that no government entity has tried to prevent the release of the film. The panel noted, however, that the case does “implicate some free speech concerns.” Citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, the court cautioned that because the injunction restrains “the viewing of an expressive work prior to its public availability,” courts “should always be hesitant to approve such an injunction.”
The Second Circuit then analyzed the key provision of the consent order:
Each of the Individual Defendants . . . shall have the right to exploit his . . . own respective life story in any manner or medium, including . . . (a) motion picture . . . . In such connection, each of the foregoing shall have the right to refer to “Lynyrd Skynyrd” and related matters and to describe and portray his experience(s) with “Lynyrd Skynyrd;” provided that no such exploitation of life story rights is authorized which purports to be a history of the “Lynyrd Skynyrd” band, as opposed to the life story of the applicable individual.
In accordance with the principle of basic fairness, those enjoined from certain conduct need specific notice as to what is actually prohibited. The Second Circuit then questioned whether the consent order was sufficiently specific and enforceable. According to the consent order, Pyle could make a movie that describes his experiences with the band and could refer to Lynyrd Skynyrd but he could not make a movie on the history of the band. The Second Circuit found this to be inconsistent, or at least insufficiently specific, and pointed to the film’s script as illustrative of this point. The film recounts the story of the plane crash. That plane crash is a part of the 'history' of the band but, at the same time, it is also an experience that Pyle had with the band. In the Second Circuit’s view, the consent order simultaneously prohibited and allowed the same movie, thus rendering its terms “sufficiently inconsistent, or at least insufficiently specific to support an injunction.”
The court then turned to two other provisions of the consent order. One prohibited “exploitation in whole or in part of the history of the Lynyrd Skynyrd band without the prior written approval of Rossington, Collins and [Van Zant’s] Estate.” The other prohibited “use of the name, likeness, portrait, picture, or biographical material” of Van Zant or Gaines, subject to certain exceptions. The Second Circuit asserted that these two additional provisions cannot be interpreted to prohibit what the key provision or the consent order expressly permits.
The panel vacated the judgment, the injunction, and the award of fees and costs, and remanded the case back to the district court.
Summary prepared by David Grossman and Lyndsi Allsop.
Click here for a PDF of the full decision.
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 21, 2020 12:44:03 GMT -5
A quick search of Florida's Dept. Of State Division Of Corporations PUBLIC RECORDS:
Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation
RONNIE VAN ZANT, INC.
Filing Information Document Number P99000070310 FEI/EIN Number 59-3681828 Date Filed 08/09/1999 State FL Status ACTIVE
Last Event REINSTATEMENT Event Date Filed 11/09/2000
Principal Address ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233
Changed: 01/28/2016 Mailing Address ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233
Changed: 01/28/2016
Registered Agent Name & Address JENNESS, JUDITH A ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233
Address Changed: 01/10/2017
Officer/Director Detail Name & Address
Title DPS
JENNESS, JUDITH A ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233
Title DVP
VAN ZANT, MELODY Atlantic Beach, FL 32266
Title DVP
VAN ZANT, TAMMY MIDDLEBURG, FL 32068
Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2018 03/15/2018 2019 02/07/2019 2020 01/25/2020
Document Images 01/25/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/07/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/15/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/10/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/28/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/11/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/10/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/14/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/10/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/27/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/14/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/20/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/23/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/21/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/29/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/12/2001 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/09/2000 -- REINSTATEMENT View image in PDF format 08/09/1999 -- Domestic Profit View image in PDF format
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 21, 2020 12:45:44 GMT -5
Interesting Melody and Tammy are both listed as vice presidents while Judy of course is president. No one else is listed as owners.
Tammy should be very thankful Judy is sharing her daddy with her and the money they make off him.
According to the public record, Judy is 50% and Melody and Tammy each have 25% shares.
Letters of incorporation show other interesting details.
Keep in mind folks, I am respecting their privacy by NOT listing their addresses and personal information found in the public record. We need to keep all of that off the forum and off the internet since it is NOT important to our learning specific details about what they are doing. We do NOT need to know where they live so please keep all of that off this forum and off the internet everywhere.
Public records SHOULD NOT be used for the wrong reasons! So keep this in mind! We can learn as long as we do it within reason.
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 21, 2020 13:04:09 GMT -5
Now, by following the public record trail left by Judy like bread crumbs, it has lead me to discover the "Tammy Van Zant Clary Term Trust", and upon doing just a regular google search I find this: www.leagle.com/decision/19981647718so2d92921414Home Browse Decisions So.2d 718 So.2d 718 So.2d 929 (1998) FIRST UNION NAT. BANK v. GRONDIN No. 98-1418. View Case Cited Cases 718 So.2d 929 (1998) FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, as Trustee of the Tammy Van Zant Clary Term Trust, Petitioner, v. Judith Ann GRONDIN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald Van Zant, Respondent. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 5, 1998. Attorney(s) appearing for the Case William P. Brant and Melissa Y. Bell of Brant, Moore, MacDonald & Wells, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Larry Smith, Frank B. Metcalf, and Stacey L. Myers of Head, Smith, Metcalf, Aguilar, Moss, Sieron & Perritt, P.A., Orange Park, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. DENIED. Steele v. Davis, 667 So.2d 264(Fla. 1st DCA 1995). JOANOS, WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notice at the bottom it clearly says DENIED and then shows a reference case: www.leagle.com/decision/1995931667so2d2641886Home Browse Decisions So.2d 667 So.2d 667 So.2d 264 (1995) STEELE v. DAVIS No. 95-884. View Case Cited Cases Citing Case 667 So.2d 264 (1995) Robert L. STEELE, M.D., and Robert L. Steele, M.D., P.A., Petitioners, v. Cecil L. DAVIS, Jr., as Guardian ad litem, for and on Behalf of Anna Nicole Carlson, a minor, Respondent. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 31, 1995. Attorney(s) appearing for the Case Richard B. Collins, Rogelio J. Fontela and Jeffery M. Scott of Collins, Shipman & Lucas, P.A., Tallahassee, for petitioners. Scott E. Gwartney of Connor & Associates, Tallahassee, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Petitioners, Robert L. Steele and Robert L. Steele, M.D., P.A., seek a writ of certiorari to overturn a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss a medical malpractice action by respondent, Cecil L. Davis, Jr., as guardian ad litem for the alleged malpractice victim, Anna Nicole Carlson, a minor, for failure to comply with the pre-suit notice requirements of section 766.106, Florida Statutes. Steele argues that the notice letter which was provided to comply with section 766.106 advised him only of a claim by Pamela Carlson, the mother of Anna Carlson, and that, since a separate notice was not provided on behalf of the child as an individual claimant prior to the running of the applicable statute of limitations, the complaint on her behalf should be dismissed. In denying the motion to dismiss, the trial court found that the letter also provided Steele adequate notice of the child's claims. Because the petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the order of the trial court denying the motion to dismiss either exceeds the trial court's jurisdiction or departs from the essential requirements of the law, we deny the petition. Anderson By and Through Anderson v. Lore, 618 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc. v. Barber, 638 So.2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). MICKLE, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur. ------------------------------------------------ Not sure what this is all about yet... anyone?
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 21, 2020 14:49:21 GMT -5
Tammy was involved in some sort of legal issue where Johnny ended up paying a large settlement on her behalf. Not sure if it was discussed briefly on the forum. Or if this is related.
|
|
|
Post by MDfan aka The MD Well Man on Feb 21, 2020 15:27:11 GMT -5
Nope I got me a lawyer to handle that kind of bull shit when it pops up in my life, and thank god since my divorce from wife number 1 I ain't needed no blood sucking weasel attorney
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 21, 2020 20:15:09 GMT -5
Interesting Melody and Tammy are both listed as vice presidents while Judy of course is president. No one else is listed as owners. Tammy should be very thankful Judy is sharing her daddy with her and the money they make off him. According to the public record, Judy is 50% and Melody and Tammy each have 25% shares. I don't understand why anyone else would be listed. Should Judy have listed her son? I don't think so.
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 21, 2020 20:36:37 GMT -5
But one thing I really found interesting is today Artimus is still married (to my knowledge) still married to Kerri Hampton Pyle, and yet he was only talking about his wife Patricia while he was in original Lynyrd Skynyrd and saying how he wished today he was still married to her and had not been a dumbass cheating on her all through his Skynyrd career. Artimus expressed a lot of sorrow and regret for blowing that marriage. But to be married to another woman today and telling the world he wished he was still married to his first wife? When I heard him going on and on about his first wife I thought it was a bit strange. I understand apologizing to her in public for cheating on her. But to embarrass this current wife that was not right. That is the mother of his youngest son. Just wow! Says a lot about his present split in half marriage to the woman who told him he had to move out to protect his youngest son from crazies who could track Artimus' residence through certain public databases. I don't understand this part. They are not living together? She told him to move out? I am confused.
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 21, 2020 21:18:42 GMT -5
I don't understand this part. They are not living together? She told him to move out? I am confused. Yes! She was looking out for their child. Living in the same residence posed a problem to her and the child because he is a registered offender and his place of residence is viewable online. And, this caused some problem with the child and school and his peers, and potential threats targeting dad, and she decided it was best for the child if the dad moved on out and go live some place else that could be tracked to him and him alone and NOT the child. Sad but true.
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 21, 2020 21:53:23 GMT -5
I don't understand this part. They are not living together? She told him to move out? I am confused. Yes! She was looking out for their child. Living in the same residence posed a problem to her and the child because he is a registered offender and his place of residence is viewable online. And, this caused some problem with the child and school and his peers, and potential threats targeting dad, and she decided it was best for the child if the dad moved on out and go live some place else that could be tracked to him and him alone and NOT the child. Sad but true. I thought maybe it was because of Skynyrd fans. That is horrible that Artimus had to move out. So Artimus lost out of time with this child as well. Yes, being a registered sex offender causes problems while his son enrolled in school. Kerri knew all this when she married Artimus. It is sad.
|
|
|
Post by JerseyGirl on Feb 22, 2020 1:06:44 GMT -5
When I heard him going on and on about his first wife I thought it was a bit strange. I understand apologizing to her in public for cheating on her. But to embarrass this current wife that was not right. That is the mother of his youngest son. Artimus does not have a current wife. No need to probe his personal life, but let's just say he's in a much better place now. Well I did not know Artimus was no longer with Kerri. Therefore I take back what I said concerning Artimus and his first wife. Cagey brought it up first. But you just seem to love to quote me.
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Feb 22, 2020 7:59:18 GMT -5
I am glad to hear he has corrected this part of his life. Good for him! I always thought she was bad news! She did not like me and I was not fond of her. I am the Southern right winger type and she is the hippie liberal commie type. We were not very compatible. OK, not compatible at all and often seemed to clash. She was very controlling and domineering. Always wanted to be in charge and in control. Liked to mess with people. Hard to believe she is in education and allowed around children. No doubt trying to turn each one of them into good little robotic commie puppets. nbms.buncombeschools.org/staff/hampton__kerri_-_e_l_a/welcome_epic_students_Ms. Kerri Hampton nbms.buncombeschools.org/staff/hampton__kerri_-_e_l_aWelcome Back to School 2020-2021 Video! I have been teaching in Buncombe County Schools for 11 years. My teaching career began at Valley Springs Middle School as a remediation teacher for grades 6, 7, and 8. In 2011 I transitioned to North Buncombe Middle School and began teaching 7th grade Social Studies and in 2014 shifted to 8th grade English Language Arts. In addition to school based committee work, like MTSS (Multi Tiered Systems of Support) I also serve on the BCS 6-12 English Leadership Team and as a Global Ambassador for the North Buncombe district. I worked in the nonprofit sector supporting arts in education prior to my second career as a teacher and continue this work of the heart by participating in multi-year long professional training on arts integration provided by a partnership between BCS, Kennedy Arts Center, and LEAF Global Arts. I have a son who attends Appalachian State University in Boone, NC and a cat named Max. I love to read, hike in the forest, travel and visit museums (when possible), piddle in my gardens, cook creatively, and spend time with friends and family. ---------------------------------------------------------- The book she is shown reading by the lake is "Just Mercy" by Bryan Stevenson a lawyer who defended disadvantaged blacks from bad horrible white people who only wanted to lock them up and throw away the key. Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption is a memoir by Bryan Stevenson that documents his career as a lawyer for disadvantaged clients. The book, focusing on injustices in the United States judicial system, alternates chapters between documenting Stevenson's efforts to overturn the wrongful conviction of Walter McMillian and his work on other cases, including children who receive life sentences and other poor or marginalized clients." Of course it is all about how bad horrible white people have built a system of justice in this country rife with systemic racism. Notice not one word about their crimes or what they did to get in trouble. Nope. Just all about bad horrible white people handing down false convictions and hefty sentences just because of skin color. It seems to paint a one-sided point of view. A perfect read for self loathing guilt ridden white liberal to dig into.
|
|
Forum Lord
Administrator
Posts: 15,790
Date Registered: November 2011
Gender:
|
Post by Forum Lord on Apr 1, 2021 9:35:40 GMT -5
|
|